dataset · audited-with-caveats · verified 2026-08-02

benchmark-dual human CRISPR-Cas9 library

A human CRISPR-Cas9 paired-guide library created to compare dual- and single-targeting strategies in loss-of-function screens.

Audited with caveats: 2 field(s) are marked provisional or conflicted. Warnings are shown next to affected values and these claims are excluded from unqualified comparisons.

Benchmark definition

What is counted

Version
initial-release
Total
45720 (Source-reported final dual-guide benchmarking library inventory.)
Task formats
unclassified
Capabilities
Prediction
Modalities
DNA or RNA sequenceWet-lab output

Version history

VersionStatusRelease / as-ofTotalFormal tracks
initial-release
benchmark-dual-human-crispr-cas9-library-initial-release-version
current2025-02-2645720 (Source-reported final dual-guide benchmarking library inventory.)None registered

Scientific Task Atlas

Scientific task classification

partial for initial-release. Candidate artifact-derived Scientific Task mappings lacked an official artifact-level locator and were omitted; task mapping remains pending a targeted official-artifact audit.

The source names only a broad direction; no more specific leaf task can be assigned without inference.

Relationship registry

How works use this benchmark

Partial claims, non-evaluation uses, and third-party summaries stay visible without entering model comparisons.

Partial evaluation claims

evaluation

a-benchmark-comparison-of-crisprn-guide-rna-design-alg-benchmark-dual-human-crispr-cas9-library-4-use

Partialunknown

Work: A benchmark comparison of CRISPRn guide-RNA design algorithms and generation of small single and dual-targeting libraries to boost screening efficiency · source version a-benchmark-comparison-of-crisprn-guide-rna-design-alg-pmc-version-1

Selection
not reported
Models
Not reported / not applicable
Metrics
log-fold changes, Chronos gene fitness estimate
Linked runs
None

Not reported / unresolved: The benchmark version is not reported.; The sample size and uncertainty for the reported −0.9 delta are not reported.; Other performance values appear only in figures; no rasterized figure pages were supplied.; Run-level seeds are not reported.; Conflicted metric claim omitted after independent verification; the evaluation relationship is published conservatively.; benchmark version; realized n/scope; exact model; numeric result

AI-assisted double-pass extraction; values are limited to independently supported claims.

Evidence
  • section: Results and discussion, Par14
    Supports: /relation_type
  • section: Results and discussion, Par14
    Supports: /benchmark_id
  • section: Results and discussion, Par14
    Supports: /metric_labels
  • section: Results and discussion, Par14
    Supports: /metric_labels

Creation, training, validation, or model-selection uses

benchmark creation

a-benchmark-comparison-of-crisprn-guide-rna-design-alg-benchmark-dual-human-crispr-cas9-library-3-use

Non-evaluationunknown

Work: A benchmark comparison of CRISPRn guide-RNA design algorithms and generation of small single and dual-targeting libraries to boost screening efficiency · source version a-benchmark-comparison-of-crisprn-guide-rna-design-alg-pmc-version-1

Selection
not applicable
Models
Not reported / not applicable
Metrics
Not reported / not applicable
Linked runs
None

Not reported / unresolved: No benchmark version is reported.; The final neutral-gene count is not printed after eight genes were removed.; The released dataset's license and version are not reported.

AI-assisted double-pass extraction; values are limited to independently supported claims.

Evidence
  • section: Results and discussion, Par14
    Supports: /relation_type
  • section: Results and discussion, Par14
    Supports: /benchmark_id
  • section: Methods, Sec9, Par26
    Supports: /scope
  • section: Methods, Sec9, Par26
    Supports: /scope

Evaluation registry

Works and run settings

A setting change—scope, prompt, tools, budget, grader, or repeats—creates a separate run. Charts never cross a comparability group.

No normalized evaluation run is published yet. Creator evidence is still attached below.

Evidence and change history

Source locators remain visible; expand an item to inspect the exact Registry fields it supports.

A benchmark comparison of CRISPRn guide-RNA design algorithms and generation of small single and dual-targeting libraries to boost screening efficiency · section: Data availability · Supports 1 field

Open source →

  • /access/level
A benchmark comparison of CRISPRn guide-RNA design algorithms and generation of small single and dual-targeting libraries to boost screening efficiency · section: Figure 2 caption and Methods, Sec9, Par26 · Supports 1 field

Open source →

  • /aliases
A benchmark comparison of CRISPRn guide-RNA design algorithms and generation of small single and dual-targeting libraries to boost screening efficiency · section: Methods, Sec9, Par26; Results and discussion, Par12 · Supports 1 field

Open source →

  • /capabilities
A benchmark comparison of CRISPRn guide-RNA design algorithms and generation of small single and dual-targeting libraries to boost screening efficiency · section: Abstract, Par9 · Supports 1 field

Open source →

  • /domains
A benchmark comparison of CRISPRn guide-RNA design algorithms and generation of small single and dual-targeting libraries to boost screening efficiency · section: Data availability · Supports 1 field

Open source →

  • /kind
A benchmark comparison of CRISPRn guide-RNA design algorithms and generation of small single and dual-targeting libraries to boost screening efficiency · section: Data availability · Supports 1 field

Open source →

  • /modalities
A benchmark comparison of CRISPRn guide-RNA design algorithms and generation of small single and dual-targeting libraries to boost screening efficiency · section: Results and discussion, Par14 · Supports 1 field

Open source →

  • /name
A benchmark comparison of CRISPRn guide-RNA design algorithms and generation of small single and dual-targeting libraries to boost screening efficiency · section: Front matter: contrib-group and Aff1 · Supports 1 field

Open source →

  • /organizations
A benchmark comparison of CRISPRn guide-RNA design algorithms and generation of small single and dual-targeting libraries to boost screening efficiency · section: Results and discussion, Par14 · Supports 1 field

Open source →

  • /summary
A benchmark comparison of CRISPRn guide-RNA design algorithms and generation of small single and dual-targeting libraries to boost screening efficiency · other: Crossref bibliographic metadata (Resolved from the canonical paper identifier during intake.) · Supports 1 field

Open source →

  • /release_date
A benchmark comparison of CRISPRn guide-RNA design algorithms and generation of small single and dual-targeting libraries to boost screening efficiency · section: Methods, Sec9, Par26 · Supports 4 fields

Open source →

  • /task_counts/total
  • /task_counts/basis
  • /versions/0/task_counts/total
  • /versions/0/task_counts/basis
A benchmark comparison of CRISPRn guide-RNA design algorithms and generation of small single and dual-targeting libraries to boost screening efficiency · section: Methods, Sec9, Par26 · Supports 2 fields

Open source →

  • /task_counts/subsets
  • /versions/0/task_counts/subsets
A benchmark comparison of CRISPRn guide-RNA design algorithms and generation of small single and dual-targeting libraries to boost screening efficiency · section: Data availability · Supports 2 fields

Open source →

  • /resources
  • /access/license
A benchmark comparison of CRISPRn guide-RNA design algorithms and generation of small single and dual-targeting libraries to boost screening efficiency · section: Front matter: article DOI · Supports 1 field

Open source →

  • /resources/0
A benchmark comparison of CRISPRn guide-RNA design algorithms and generation of small single and dual-targeting libraries to boost screening efficiency · section: Front matter: article DOI · Supports 2 fields

Open source →

  • /latest_version
  • /versions/0

Unresolved field claims

  • /task_counts/subsetsProvisional · high — The double-pass review established the root item total but did not establish an exhaustive formal-subset inventory; the empty list must not be interpreted as evidence that the benchmark has no subsets.
    Evidence: benchmark-dual-human-crispr-cas9-library-automated-subset-coverage-evidence
  • /access/licenseProvisional · high — The double-pass review verified the official resource identity but did not establish a redistributable benchmark license; the value remains null pending source-level license verification.
    Evidence: benchmark-dual-human-crispr-cas9-library-automated-resource-evidence

View source-level modification history on GitHub →