competition · audited-with-caveats · verified 2026-07-21

CASP

Biennial blind community experiments that assess macromolecular structure, complex, ligand, and model-accuracy prediction against experimental structures withheld during prediction.

+3 more
Nucleic-acid result atlas: B14 results (family_member) · B15 results (family_member)
Audited with caveats: 1 field(s) are marked provisional or conflicted. Warnings are shown next to affected values and these claims are excluded from unqualified comparisons.
Round and count audit: CASP17 is an active, rolling 2026 round; all displayed CASP17 counts are dated to 2026-07-21. CASP16 is the latest completed round. Phase releases, unique targets, assessment units, and ligand cases use different bases and are never summed into a synthetic total.

Benchmark definition

What is counted

Version
CASP17
Total
Not reported (round-specific target releases; categories and repeated phases overlap)
Task formats
blind structure prediction; blind complex prediction; blind ligand pose and affinity prediction; model accuracy estimation
Capabilities
Prediction
Modalities
Protein sequenceDNA or RNA sequence3D structure

Version history

VersionStatusRelease / as-ofTotalFormal tracks
CASP16
casp-suite-casp16
superseded2024-05-01Not reported (target releases across overlapping categories and phases)casp-protein-monomers, casp-protein-multimers, casp-protein-ligands
CASP17
casp-suite-casp17
rolling2026-04-27Not reported (round-specific target releases; categories and repeated phases overlap)casp-protein-monomers, casp-protein-multimers, casp-protein-ligands

Tracks and subsets

IDCountBasisPartition?Notes
CASP17 protein targets released without stoichiometry
casp17-protein-no-stoichiometry
75target releasesNoIncludes monomers and multimers; it must not be added to the with-stoichiometry count.
CASP17 protein targets released with stoichiometry
casp17-protein-with-stoichiometry
61multimer target re-releasesNoMultimer targets only; these overlap with targets released earlier without stoichiometry.
CASP17 RNA targets
casp17-rna-targets
45target releasesNoIncludes RNA monomers and multimers.
CASP17 protein-RNA-DNA hybrid targets
casp17-hybrid-targets
8target releasesNo

Registered child tracks

CASP Protein-Ligand Prediction

Formal CASP track for blind prediction of protein-ligand binding poses, binding affinity or rank, binding pockets, and pose confidence.

3 evaluation run(s)

CASP Protein Monomers

Formal CASP track assessing blind predictions of single-protein structures and post hoc protein evaluation units against withheld experimental coordinates.

1 evaluation run(s)

CASP Protein Multimers

Formal CASP track assessing blind protein-complex predictions, including overall folds, interfaces, stoichiometry-free phases, and model-selection phases.

1 evaluation run(s)

Scientific Task Atlas

Scientific task classification

partial for CASP17 · as of 2026-07-21. CASP17 is active; mappings follow formal categories while final assessed target counts remain unavailable.

Scientific taskCoverageCountMappingEvidence
Protein monomer structure predictionexplicitly-in-scopeNot reported
CASP17 assessed monomer evaluation units.
official-track
high confidence
casp-evidence-casp17-protocol
The final assessed monomer count is not yet reported.
Protein complex structure predictionexplicitly-in-scope61 targets
CASP17 multimer target re-releases with stoichiometry as of 2026-07-21.
official-track
high confidence
casp-evidence-casp17-counts
Rolling release count; not a final assessed-set total.
Protein model quality assessmentexplicitly-in-scopeNot reported
CASP17 model-selection and accuracy-estimation targets.
official-track
high confidence
casp-evidence-casp17-protocol
No final current-round count is asserted.
Protein-ligand pose predictionexplicitly-in-scopeNot reported
CASP17 protein-ligand targets.
official-track
high confidence
casp-evidence-casp17-protocol
Pose prediction is a formal ligand-category objective.
Protein-ligand binding affinityexplicitly-in-scopeNot reported
CASP17 protein-ligand targets.
official-track
high confidence
casp-evidence-casp17-protocol
Affinity or rank prediction is a formal ligand-category objective.

Scientific coverage notes

DomainCoverageCountInterpretation
Protein-protein bindingexplicitly-in-scope61CASP17 reports 61 multimer targets re-released with stoichiometry as of 2026-07-21; this is a rolling target-release count, not an evaluated final set.
Antibody-antigenexplicitly-in-scopeNot reportedImmune complexes are a dedicated CASP17 category, but the official in-numbers page does not publish a separate immune-complex count.
Protein-ligand bindingexplicitly-in-scopeNot reportedOrganic ligand-protein complexes are a dedicated CASP17 category, but no current ligand-only target count is published on the CASP17 in-numbers page.

Evaluation registry

Works and run settings

A setting change—scope, prompt, tools, budget, grader, or repeats—creates a separate run. Charts never cross a comparability group.

casp16-ligand-affinity-stage1vCASP16
Scopesubset · n=122
ShotsNot applicable
TurnsNot applicable
System prompt publicNot applicable
Reasoning / effortNot applicable
Browsermethod-specific
Internetmethod-specific
Databasesmethod-specific
Code executionallowed
ContainerNot reported
External toolsmethod-specific
Token budgetNot applicable
Time / cost budgettarget-specific CASP submission windows before experimental poses were released
TemperatureNot applicable
SeedNot reported
RepeatsModel 1 affinity submission per group and case
Graderofficial affinity ranking analysis plus independent ligand assessor team · human review: yes
StatisticsN-weighted Kendall tau across the two protein systems after disclosure filtering
Contaminationexperimental poses and affinities withheld, with 18 previously disclosed affinities removed from analysis
Metrics, results, and full protocol

Metrics

MetricKind / baselineUnitAggregationThreshold / tolerance
N-weighted Kendall's tauabsoluterank correlationcase-count-weighted mean of per-protein-system Kendall tau after disclosure filteringNot reported

No numeric result rows are published yet; the verified protocol remains useful.

Evidence

  • section: Sections 2.2–2.5 and 3.3; Figure 8A (Original 140 cases, 18 disclosure exclusions, Stage-1 setting, Model 1, and N-weighted Kendall tau.) — supports /benchmark_version, /scope, /protocol, /metrics
casp16-ligand-affinity-stage2vCASP16
Scopesubset · n=103
ShotsNot applicable
TurnsNot applicable
System prompt publicNot applicable
Reasoning / effortNot applicable
Browsermethod-specific
Internetmethod-specific
Databasesmethod-specific
Code executionallowed
ContainerNot reported
External toolsmethod-specific
Token budgetNot applicable
Time / cost budget2024-08-07 through 2024-08-21 for the main Stage-2 challenge
TemperatureNot applicable
SeedNot reported
RepeatsModel 1 affinity submission per group and case
Graderofficial affinity ranking analysis plus independent ligand assessor team · human review: yes
Statisticsper-system Kendall tau and N-weighted cross-system summary after disclosure filtering
Contaminationexperimental co-crystal structures provided while experimental affinities remained withheld; disclosed affinities removed
Metrics, results, and full protocol

Metrics

MetricKind / baselineUnitAggregationThreshold / tolerance
N-weighted Kendall's tauabsoluterank correlationcase-count-weighted mean of per-protein-system Kendall tau after disclosure filteringNot reported

No numeric result rows are published yet; the verified protocol remains useful.

Evidence

  • section: Sections 2.2–2.5 and 3.3; Figures 8B-C and 9 (110 releases, 103 retained cases, co-crystal structure access, Stage-2 dates, and Kendall tau analysis.) — supports /benchmark_version, /scope, /protocol, /metrics
casp16-ligand-pose-regularvCASP16
Scopesubset · n=229
ShotsNot applicable
TurnsNot applicable
System prompt publicNot applicable
Reasoning / effortNot applicable
Browsermethod-specific
Internetmethod-specific
Databasesmethod-specific
Code executionallowed
ContainerNot reported
External toolsmethod-specific
Token budgetNot applicable
Time / cost budgettarget-specific CASP submission windows
TemperatureNot applicable
SeedNot reported
Repeatsup to five pose models per target
Graderofficial OpenStructure ligand and binding-pocket scoring plus independent ligand assessor team · human review: yes
Statisticsmean per-group pose accuracy with explicit handling of skipped targets; Model 1 is the primary ranking view
Contaminationexperimental complex poses withheld during Stage 1 prediction; structural template similarity analyzed post hoc
Metrics, results, and full protocol

Metrics

MetricKind / baselineUnitAggregationThreshold / tolerance
LDDT-PLIabsoluteproportionmean across eligible pose targets with missing-prediction handlingCASP16 modified the CASP15 definition to penalize erroneous non-native contacts.
BiSyRMSDabsoluteangstromper pose then group summarysymmetry-corrected after binding-site superposition
LDDT-lpabsoluteproportionper binding pocket then group summaryNot reported
BB-RMSDabsoluteangstrombinding-site C-alpha RMSD then group summaryNot reported

No numeric result rows are published yet; the verified protocol remains useful.

Evidence

  • section: Abstract; Sections 2.1–2.5 and 3.1–3.2 (229 assessed pose cases, participant protocol, Model 1 handling, pose metrics, missing submissions, and separate baselines.) — supports /benchmark_version, /scope, /protocol, /metrics

Evaluation run

casp16-monomer-regular-official

From CASP16 Protein Monomer Structure Prediction Assessment

casp16-monomer-regular-officialvCASP16
Scopefull · n=54
ShotsNot applicable
TurnsNot applicable
System prompt publicNot applicable
Reasoning / effortNot applicable
Browsermethod-specific
Internetmethod-specific
Databasesmethod-specific
Code executionallowed
ContainerNot reported
External toolsmethod-specific
Token budgetNot applicable
Time / cost budgetapproximately three weeks per target for regular groups
TemperatureNot applicable
SeedNot reported
Repeatsup to five submitted models per target
Graderofficial CASP structure-comparison pipeline plus independent monomer assessor team · human review: yes
Statisticsper-evaluation-unit scores converted to group ranking summaries including cumulative clipped z-scores
Contaminationexperimental structures withheld until prediction closes
Metrics, results, and full protocol

Metrics

MetricKind / baselineUnitAggregationThreshold / tolerance
GDT_TSabsolutescorecomputed per evaluation unit; official group rankings use first/best model views and z-score summariesNot reported
GDT_HAabsolutescoreper evaluation unitNot reported
lDDTabsoluteproportionper evaluation unitNot reported
TM-scoreabsoluteproportionper evaluation unitNot reported
SUM Z-score (> -2.0)absolutez-score sumsum across eligible evaluation units after clipping values below -2.0Not reported

No numeric result rows are published yet; the verified protocol remains useful.

Evidence

  • section: Results and Discussion; performance evaluation and ranking (54 evaluation units, model-1/best-model analyses, metrics, and assessor interpretation.) — supports /benchmark_version, /scope, /protocol/grader, /protocol/statistical, /metrics
  • section: Registration; Targets; Model submission/format; Assessment (Blind targets, regular versus server settings, deadlines, and independent assessment.) — supports /protocol/shots, /protocol/turns, /protocol/system_prompt_public, /protocol/reasoning, /protocol/tools, /protocol/token_budget, /protocol/time_budget, /protocol/temperature, /protocol/seed, /protocol/repeats, /protocol/contamination
casp16-multimer-phase1-regularvCASP16
Scopefull · n=40
ShotsNot applicable
TurnsNot applicable
System prompt publicNot applicable
Reasoning / effortNot applicable
Browsermethod-specific
Internetmethod-specific
Databasesmethod-specific
Code executionallowed
ContainerNot reported
External toolsmethod-specific
Token budgetNot applicable
Time / cost budgetapproximately three weeks per target for regular groups
TemperatureNot applicable
SeedNot reported
Repeatsup to five standard models per target
Graderofficial CASP/OpenStructure and CAPRI-compatible scoring plus independent complex assessor team · human review: yes
Statisticscumulative per-target z-scores and head-to-head comparisons; rankings reported for first and best models
Contaminationexperimental complex structures withheld until prediction closes
Metrics, results, and full protocol

Metrics

MetricKind / baselineUnitAggregationThreshold / tolerance
DockQabsoluteproportionper target followed by cumulative z-score ranking0.5
TM-scoreabsoluteproportionper target followed by cumulative z-score rankingNot reported
lDDTabsoluteproportionper target followed by cumulative z-score rankingNot reported
ICSabsoluteF1 scoreper target followed by cumulative z-score rankingNot reported
IPSabsoluteJaccard scoreper target followed by cumulative z-score rankingNot reported
QSbestabsoluteJaccard scoreper target followed by cumulative z-score rankingNot reported

No numeric result rows are published yet; the verified protocol remains useful.

Evidence

  • section: Overview of targets; Phase 1 Ranking; Performance Evaluation and Ranking (40 Phase-1 targets, supplied stoichiometry, overall/interface metrics, first/best model analyses, and group ranking aggregation.) — supports /benchmark_version, /scope, /protocol/grader, /protocol/statistical, /metrics
  • section: Protein Complexes; Registration; Model submission/format; Assessment (Blind regular-group protocol, participant method freedom, deadlines, and assessors.) — supports /protocol/shots, /protocol/turns, /protocol/system_prompt_public, /protocol/reasoning, /protocol/tools, /protocol/token_budget, /protocol/time_budget, /protocol/temperature, /protocol/seed, /protocol/repeats, /protocol/contamination

Evidence and change history

Source locators remain visible; expand an item to inspect the exact Registry fields it supports.

casp1-history-resource · section: CASP1 description (Reports the first large-scale experiment in 1994, 33 targets, 35 groups, and independent assessment teams; no exact start day is given.) · Supports 6 fields

Open source →

  • /name
  • /aliases
  • /organizations
  • /release_date
  • /kind
  • /summary
CASP16 official competition and results archive · section: Description; Modeling categories; Timetable; Targets; Assessment; Results (Completed-round scope, blind protocol, categories, independent assessors, access, and first-target date.) · Supports 11 fields

Open source →

  • /domains
  • /capabilities
  • /modalities
  • /task_formats
  • /access
  • /access/level
  • /access/license
  • /resources
  • /implementations
  • /versions/0/release_date
  • /versions/0/formal_tracks
casp16-numbers-resource · table: CASP16 in numbers (Reports 156 tertiary, 108 multimer, 8 incidental ligand, 233 pharma pose, 140 pharma affinity, and 110 stage-2 affinity target releases, plus submission counts.) · Supports 3 fields

Open source →

  • /versions/0/task_counts/total
  • /versions/0/task_counts/basis
  • /versions/0/task_counts/subsets
CASP17 official competition · section: Description; Modeling categories; Timetable; Targets; Assessment; Results (Defines the active CASP17 round, dedicated immune and ligand categories, difficult structures/complexes, release schedule, and independent assessors.) · Supports 10 fields

Open source →

  • /latest_version
  • /domains
  • /coverage_notes
  • /versions/1/release_date
  • /versions/1/as_of
  • /versions/1/formal_tracks
  • /scientific_task_classification/entries/0
  • /scientific_task_classification/entries/2
  • /scientific_task_classification/entries/3
  • /scientific_task_classification/entries/4
casp17-numbers-resource · table: CASP17 in numbers, accessed 2026-07-21 (Rolling counts: 75 protein targets without stoichiometry, 61 multimer re-releases with stoichiometry, 45 RNA targets, and 8 hybrids.) · Supports 8 fields

Open source →

  • /task_counts/total
  • /task_counts/basis
  • /task_counts/subsets
  • /coverage_notes/0
  • /versions/1/task_counts/total
  • /versions/1/task_counts/basis
  • /versions/1/task_counts/subsets
  • /scientific_task_classification/entries/1

Unresolved field claims

  • /release_dateProvisional · medium — The official CASP1 history reports only the year 1994; 1994-01-01 is a machine-readable year-normalized date and not an asserted day of first target release.
    Evidence: casp-evidence-origin

View source-level modification history on GitHub →